I ordered the day1ca order for a hiking backpack from the Canada. I placed the order using TWM 1.5 and it appeared to have processed. But, the transaction was never sent to the blockchain and my wallet balance was decreased substantially higher (approx 30,000 sfx missing) than the listed sfx price. I see the transaction in my history, but the block height says 0 as well as 0 for blockchain confirmations.
offer id = 46f00f0d33d6c25323cb95c3518b74f38ec89acc463abdf29a6638be5f91b8de
txid = 86765ddbf18b83f24090d17ab34f367af813c929462cd2136b723a194a428261
I should note that I did open and close TWM 1.0 prior to opening TWM 1.5 to execute the order. I have not uninstalled the wallet and attempted to restart with my recovery phrase. Interestingly, between the two wallets I see a difference in sfx price for the listing as well as the order message. The TWM 1.5 wallet order message shows NaN for the price. TWM 1.0 shows a 189 sfx price. Neither is correct. I have uploaded some screenshots to illustrate my issue.
Firstly, do a Restore from Keys and save as a new file name. Once it syncs, I think youâll find your original balance is intact (and the purchase wonât be there)
[I was gonna suggest a hard rescan, but that would get rid of the messed up tx, so for now, letâs leave it there, in case Dan needs to reference something from it.]
A check on that txid definitely doesnât exist on the blockchainâŚ
As to the failed tx, my guess is that the tx that got created didnât have the correct amount of SFX allocated for the purchase, and thus the purchase tx was rejected by the daemon and didnât get processed.
Aussiesloth, thanks for approving my post and the information. The transaction failed and after a hard rescan I was able to see that my sfx tokens remain in my wallet. The failed transaction persists in my wallet but thats really not a problem. Honestly, I didnât pay attention too much to the price changing while ordering. I did swiftly fill out the form, but next time I will be aware. Again, thanks for the assistance. I look forward to trying it again soon.
I believe that if you used v1, then you would need to scan fresh with v1.5
As we mentioned to each other over twitter, v1.5 should be primarily used, and this âbugâ yet a glitch that makes appearance that a purchase was completed, however it isnât. The message gets through as that uses layer 2 however the transaction does not so the backend does not process the shipment as it 15x checks the transaction was mined into the blockchain.
Standing by for any further clarity, though I think this is clear as it would need to get.
So glad for your punt, and we;re looking forward to our Canada and UK rollout!
How about you take a breath and pull your head in. You seriously have no idea how many competing priorities Dan is juggling, and at any point in time, plans can change quickly, depending on what else needs more urgent attention.
UK also!