RandomSFX CPU Mining Benchmarks (list your CPUs, the specs and hashrate)

Would be cool if everyone could share their hashrate performance on the computers they’re mining from.

Standard format:

CPU, Memory, Operating System, Hashrate.

Example:

  • AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, 16GB DDR4 3200MHz CL16 (2 x 8GB), Windows 10, 4889H/s
  • Intel Core i7-7700K, 32GB DDR4 3000MHz CL15 (4 x 8GB), Windows 10, 2463H/s

Looking forward to seeing the numbers!

4 Likes

Intel Core i5-2540M, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro, 540H/s

3 Likes

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 3.4GHz, 16GB , Win10, up to 4.1 KH/s

3 Likes

Intel® Xeon® E3-1225 v5 3.30GHz, 32GB, Ubuntu 18.04LTS, up to 2025.8 H/s

3 Likes

Intel i7 3540M, 8GB DDR3, Windows 10, 600 h/s on daemon three threads, 1 Kh/s on xmrig two threads, huge pages on. All solo mining.

3 Likes

Intel i3 4130, 8GB DDR3, Win7 630h/s,
AMD FX-6300 ,32 GB DDR3, Win7 720h/s.
mining using xmrig.

2 Likes

Intel Core i7-4770, 32GB DDR3, Ubuntu 18.04, Huge Pages enabled, 2338h/s

Via Safex Rig -> Local Safex Node

2 Likes

AMD R5 3600 4.15ghz locked, 16GB ddr4, windows, Huge pages enabled, 6650h/s

Safex rig

2 Likes

Man that’s pretty tight. What spec is your memory running at?

1 Like

Cl14 3200mhz

1 Like

ryzen 1800x unclocked 3900+

2 Likes

Intel Core i5-6600K, 3.9GHz, 32GB RAM, Win 10, 936 H/s

I feel like my hashrate is too low for my setup. Likely something I can adjust in my config.json file to optimize it?

1 Like

@Rich.bate I’m getting a slightly lower rate with a similar AMD Ryzen 7 2700 (non-X version) at 4200H/s, Ubuntu 18

1 Like

i7-6700HQ, 16gb DDR3, Win10 = ~1400H/s

2 Likes
  • AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, 16GB DDR4 3200MHz CL14 (2 x 8GB), Windows 10, 13,300 H/s
7 Likes

Welcome @pirev. Looks like a sweet hashrate and setup.

1 Like

How many coins do you get per day at this rate?

Gr.

A.

It very much depends on the overall network hashrate, which changes as various pools direct hashrate towards or away from Safex blockchain.

Last month, my ~3kh/s was getting 10-15 SFX per day. But the last 11 days, I’ve mined over 300 because of lower network hashrate.

2 Likes

Thanks again amigo!

1 Like